Meta PixelAnnual Audit Report 2024 — City of Bais — Page 54

Page 54 of 88

Page 54
                  Management should have exerted efforts in following up the credit
                  notices.

5.5. Overall, it is emphasized that failure to settle the accounts is a “prima facie”
     presumption under Article 217 of the Revised Penal Code that these funds have been
     malversed for personal use and benefits (Martinez vs. Sandiganbayan, GR No.
     126413 dated August 20, 1999), and shall likewise constitute violation of Article 218
     of the Revised Penal Code and Section 89 of P.D. No. 1445 for failure to render
     accounts which is punishable under Section 128 thereof, viz:

         “Section 128. Penal provision. Any violation of the provisions of Section
         67, 68, 89, 106 and 108 of this Code or any regulation issued by the
         Commission implementing these sections, shall be punished by a fine not
         exceeding one thousand pesos or by imprisonment not exceeding six
         months, or both such fine and imprisonment in the discretion of the court.”
         (Underscoring ours)

5.6. Nevertheless, may we remind Management of the provision under Section 104 of
     P.D. No. 1445 which stipulates that:

         “Records and reports required by primarily responsible officers. The
         head of any agency or instrumentality of the national government xxx shall
         exercise the diligence of a good father of a family in supervising accountable
         officers under his control to prevent the incurrence of loss of government
         funds or property, otherwise he shall be jointly and solidarily liable with the
         person primarily accountable therefor. xxx.” (Underscoring supplied)

5.7. The inability to fully settle the cash advances exposed government funds to personal
     use and/or misappropriation and likewise misstated the receivable and related
     expense accounts in the financial statements. Moreover, the propriety and validity of
     the expenses incurred from payments out of the advances cannot be ascertained.

5.8. We recommended that the City Mayor direct all AOs to settle their unliquidated
     cash advances by undertaking the following:

      5.8.1. Thru the City Accountant, send demand letters for the immediate
             liquidation of unliquidated cash advances, particularly for the travel and
             special undertakings, withhold payment of any money owing to the AO
             after due notice, and henceforth, strictly observe the requirements/
             limitations stipulated under Section 89 of P.D. No. 1445 and COA
             Circular No. 96-004;

      5.8.2. Communicate with COA Central Office as to the status of the liquidation
             reports submitted for the Confidential and Intelligence Funds cash
             advances granted from CYs 2011-2015 so that settlement could be
             recognized in the books;



                                                                                           48