APMT — Page 63 of 90
AGENCY ACTION PLAN and STATUS of IMPLEMENTATION RESULTS of COA VALIDATION
Agency Action Plan (for Partially Implemented
and Not Implemented Recommendations) Reason for Actual
Status of Partial/Delay/ Action Date Status of
Audit Action Plan/ Target Implementation
Ref. Audit Observations Person/ Implemen- Non- Taken/Action Follow Implemen- Remarks
Recommendations Remarks Department Implementati Implementation, Date
Responsible tation to be Taken Up tation
on Date if applicable
From To From To
2012-001, thus the committee solely voluminous
determination of the dedicated to the procurement
reasonableness of task so that projects.
contract prices and the contracts can be
initial evaluation that reviewed promptly
the contractual as to the
covenants were not reasonableness of
disadvantageous to prices and
the Provincial deficiencies
Government could not corrected before
be timely conducted. final payments are
made.
2021 The distribution of 81. Require the a & b) The then Ms. PSWDO Jan Dec Partially Change of 7/16/25 Not
AAR, various welfare goods Provincial Vicky G. Enopia Implemented person in Implemented
AO No. amounting to Accountant and PSWDO during the charge; no
10, P54,798,286.00 for the OIC-PSWDO Pandemic, failed to records or
page relief operations to submit the return over the copies of the
62 during the declaration following Acknowledgment distribution lists
of the General and documents: Receipts of the were turned
Enhanced Community a. Acknowledgment recipient LGUs and over upon
Quarantine in CY receipt or any master list of the retirement of
2020 due to COVID- document showing intended beneficiaries. OIC
19 pandemic was not proof of receipt of
properly documented the welfare goods c) The then OIC-
contrary to Section by the recipient PSWDO Rosa Emelia
4(6) of Presidential LGUs; S. Banquerigo
Decree (P.D) No. b. Master list of the requested for a copy of
1445 and pertinent intended the Relief Distribution
provision of COA beneficiaries per Sheet submitted by
Circular No. 2012-01 LGU; and Ms. Vicky G. Enopia
dated June 14, 2012, c. Authority from the from your office for
thus, raising doubt that intended review. It was later
some of the relief beneficiaries and found that the name of Remind
goods were not identification the recipient LGUs PAccO, PSWDO about
actually given to the documents if were lacking, making it this deficiency
intended claimed by a difficult to verify the
beneficiaries. person other than identities of the
the payee; recipients.
82. Management The Accounting Office Not
requires the is still coordinating with Implemented