Meta PixelAnnual Audit Report 2024 — City of Tanjay — Page 110

Page 110 of 111

Page 110
                                                                                               Status of
 Ref               Observation                          Recommendations                   Implementation/
                                                                                         Results of Validation
 AO      worth ₱250,000.00 for the         Individual Program of Work, the                No action taken by
No. 7,   painting of a 6 meter by 8 meter  Abstract of Bids, canvass and                    management.
Unnu     school stage which were also      AIR, be made to answer for the
mbere    found to have not been applied to alleged purchase of paints worth
d page   the project, thereby resulting to ₱250,000.00 and to refund such
         loss of government funds.         cost to the government.
2007     The City Government paid 114) Management require the City                          Unimplemented
AAR,     honoraria      amounting       to Accountant and the City                          The City did not
 AO      ₱655,200.00 to the Board of       Treasurer to bill the COMELEC                   receive any refund
No. 2,   Election Inspectors (BEIs) during for the amount disbursed by the                from the recipients.
page     the May 14, 2007 National and     city as honoraria to the BEIs in
 22      Local Elections in violation of   the May 14, 2007 National and
         Section 10 of the Omnibus         Local     Elections,   otherwise,
         Election Code of the Philippines  require the recipients to refund
         (Batas Pambansa Blg. 881).        the amount collected.

                                               115) The bill be sent to the local           Implemented
                                                    COMELEC inasmuch as the                Management had
                                                    honoraria was not coursed thru         sent a bill to the
                                                    the national COMELEC but paid            COMELEC.
                                                    directly to the BEIs.
2007     Properties        amounting        to 116) Management require the AOs to          Unimplemented
AAR,     ₱180,490.00 were lost but no               file an application for relief of     No action taken by
 AO      requests for relief from property          property accountability together        management.
No.4,    accountability were requested in           with supporting documentation.
page     violation of Section 378, Title VI,        In case of denial on the requests
 26      Book II of R.A. No. 7160 and               of relief, require them to pay the
         Section 73 of P.D. No. 1445, thus          money value of such property.
         these are still carried in the books
         of accounts of the City, thereby
         overstating the assets accounts.
2007     The computerization program of 117) A cut-off status report be                     Unimplemented
AAR,     the CTO was not provided with the          prepared for the actual work         Management did not
 AO      complete                specification      accomplished by the original           submit the cut-off
No. 9,   requirements on the collection             programmer vis-à-vis the original     status report for the
page     system, thus, data and reports             contract for the computerization          actual work
 34      generated from the system were             of the CTO and all its systems.       accomplished by the
         not complete and accurate.                                                      original programmer.
2005     The lot purchased by the City of 118) Management secure the TCT of                 Unimplemented
AAR,     Tanjay under TCT No. T-19965               the lot purchased as an                No action taken by
 AO      for      ₱1,950,000.00        lacked       indispensable         requirement,        management.
No. 5,   sufficient documentation and did           without prejudice to the price
page     not have the requisite Certificate         evaluation to be made based on
 39      of Title under the name of the             the      Provincial      Appraisal
         LGU in violation of Section 148 of         Committee report and BIR zonal
         COA Circular No. 92-386 and                valuations previously submitted
         Section 449 of the GAAM,                   by the City Assessor, including
         Volume I.                                  the necessity of incurring
                                                    additional costs for the existing
                                                    building thereon.




                                                                                                            103