Status of
Ref Observation Recommendations Implementation/
Results of Validation
2020 Notarial Fees and Documentary 71) The City demand for the refund Unimplemented
AAR, Stamps totaling ₱1,030,424.00 of the total amount of The supplier had not
AO incurred in the opening of LC to ₱1,030,424.00 from the supplier refunded the amount
No. facilitate the payment of the to reimburse the amount paid by of ₱1,030,424.00 to
11, procurement of brand new heavy the City for the Notarial Fees and the City.
page equipment and vehicles were Documentary Stamps incurred in
64 shouldered by the City the opening of the LC, the burden
Government contrary to Section of which should be shouldered by
42.6 of the 2016 Revised IRR of the supplier as specified in Item
R.A. No. 9184, Item 4.3 of 12 of the General Conditions of
Appendix 16 of R.A. No. 9184, Contract and in accordance to the
and Item 12 of the General provisions of R.A. No. 9184.
Conditions of Contract. The Otherwise, the payment shall be a
payment was recorded as an personal liability of the officials
additional cost of equipment, who authorized the said irregular
resulting in the overstatement disbursement.
thereof. Moreover, the said
payment was without approved
appropriation in violation of
Sections 305 (a) and 306 of R.A.
No. 7160, thus considered
irregular expenditures.
2020 Distribution of the ESP through 72) The City, through the CSWDO, Unimplemented
AAR, SAP to the 24 barangays of the submit the evaluation report on Management still did
AO City could not be properly the eligibility of the ESP-SAP not submit an
No. validated since the CSWDO recipients and the encoded SAC evaluation report on
13, neither provided the evaluation forms. the eligibility of the
page report on the eligibility of the ESP SAP recipients
70 recipients nor the encoded Social and the encoded SAC
Amelioration Card (SAC) forms forms.
contrary to the pertinent
provisions of DSWD MC No. 09, 73) The City conduct a thorough Unimplemented
series of 2020 or the Omnibus revalidation of the listed No action taken by
Guidelines in the Implementation ineligible beneficiaries. management.
of the ESP.
74) Should the revalidation prove that Unimplemented
the listed beneficiaries are indeed No action taken by
ineligible, the responsible City management.
Officials refund the improperly
provided subsidy to the 35
beneficiaries totaling
₱210,000.00, notwithstanding the
inclusion of other ineligible
recipients upon further validation
pending submission of the
aforestated reports from the
CSWD and without prejudice to
the demand for refund from the
said beneficiaries as a matter of
personal recourse.
2019 The City government availed of a 75) Management justify the necessity Implemented
AAR, ₱300,000,000.00 loan from Land of procuring multiple heavy Management had
AO Bank of the Philippines and agreed equipment given the above submitted a copy of
93
