Meta PixelAnnual Audit Report 2024 — Municipality of Sibulan — Page 69

Page 69 of 122

Page 69
   7.3    Our interview with the municipal accounting personnel revealed that the
          misclassification resulted from an oversight in reviewing the nature of the
          transactions during the preparation and approval of the related JEVs.

   7.4    Such misclassification of expenses contradicts COA Circular No. 2015-009, dated
          December 1, 2015, and leads to inaccurate financial reporting because recorded
          transactions do not accurately reflect their true nature, which can potentially
          mislead decision-makers, auditors, and stakeholders.

   7.5    As a result of the foregoing, the Other MOOE account was overstated by
          ₱1,006,552.50, while the Prizes and Training Expenses accounts were understated
          by ₱148,100.00 and ₱205,650.00. On the other hand, the balances of the inventory
          account and the related expense account are misstated by an undetermined amount
          due to the non-submission of the inventory of supplies held in stock at the end of
          the year.

   7.6    We recommended and the Municipal Accountant agreed to ensure that only
          transactions not falling under any of the specific maintenance and operating
          expense accounts are recorded under the Other MOOE account.
          Furthermore, we recommended and it was agreed that personnel authorized
          to prepare and approve the JEVs be properly instructed to ensure that the
          accounts used align with COA Circular No. 2015-009, dated December 1,
          2015.

   7.7    The Municipal Accountant further explained that the transactions intended to be
          recorded under specific inventory accounts were initially categorized as
          disbursements under Other MOOE for the GAD, LDRRM, and Special Purpose
          Appropriation, as reflected in the records of the Municipal Budget Officer.

8. Taxes totaling ₱480,012.50 paid for the processing of land title acquisition were
   incorrectly recorded as expenses under “Other Maintenance and Operating
   Expenses” instead of being capitalized as part of the cost of the land, contrary to
   Paragraph 30 of IPSAS 17, resulting in the understatement of the Property, Plant,
   and Equipment (PPE) account and the overstatement of expenses by the same
   amount.

   8.1    Paragraph 30 of International Public Sector Accounting Standard (IPSAS) 17
          identifies the elements of the cost of an item of PPE. It provides that the cost of an
          item of PPE comprises:

           a) Its purchase price, including import duties and non-refundable purchase
              taxes, after deducting trade discounts and rebates.




                                                                                             52