Meta PixelAnnual Audit Report 2024 — Province of Negros Oriental — Page 75

Page 75 of 161

Page 75
   11.22 While “SAGAR” may be an acronym, it appears to be derived from the
         governor’s surname, which may create the perception that the program is
         personal rather than officially representing the province. In DILG Legal
         Opinion No. 40 s. 2015 dated October 1, 2015, issued in their response to a
         query from the former Provincial Administrator regarding the similarity
         between the former governor’s surname and a provincial government program,
         the DILG stated that “signboards, equipment, facilities, and other publicity
         materials relating to PPAs should only bear the prescribed features or
         elements of the PPAs and should not in any way contain elements
         associated, related, pertaining or that could be mistaken for the top
         leadership of the project proponent or implementing agency, unit or
         office.” (Emphasis ours)

   11.23 We recommended and Management agreed to submit a justification for the
         employment of Force Multipliers and the creation and maintenance of
         these Task Forces, as well as detailed description of their specific duties,
         functions and expected outputs.

   11.24 We also recommended and Management agreed that henceforth, the
         specific duties, functions, and expected outputs be incorporated in the
         individual contracts of services and that these personnel be required to
         submit monthly accomplishment reports aligned with the respective duties,
         functions and expected outputs to establish the necessity of their services.

   11.25 Furthermore, we reiterated our recommendation and Management agreed
         to discontinue the use of any government official’s name in government
         programs and desist from charging to government funds any expenses
         related to programs that include the initials or surname of any government
         personality.

Failure to Secure Separate Sanggunian Authorization for Lump Sum Appropriations

12. Appropriations amounting to ₱11,500,000.00 from the 20% Development Fund
    (DF) for an Electrification Program in various barangays, described in generic
    terms, were utilized to procure service wires for distribution to barangays at a cost
    of ₱11,495,167.80, without securing the required separate Sanggunian
    authorization under Section 22(c) of RA No. 7160.

   12.1    Section 22(c) of RA No. 7160 states that, unless otherwise provided in the Code,
           no contract may be entered into by the local chief executive on behalf of the
           local government unit without prior authorization from the concerned
           sanggunian.

   12.2    Further, Article 454(d) of the IRR of RA No. 7160 partly provides that Article
           391 of the IRR mandates each LGU to appropriate their share of proceeds from
           the development and utilization of national wealth to fund local development
           and livelihood projects. Disbursements from such special accounts under the
           General Fund shall proceed from the itemized appropriations in the budget
           of the LGU, rather than lumpsum amounts. These itemized appropriations

                                                                                        69