Meta PixelAnnual Audit Report 2024 — Municipality of Santa Catalina — Page 49

Page 49 of 67

Page 49
15.5 In case of failure to meet the targets set under Sec. 44-F, the obliged enterprise
     shall pay the same fines set above or a fine twice the cost of recovery and diversion
     of the footprint or its shortfall, whichever is higher.

15.6 In its effort to comply with RA 9003 and its Implementing Rules and Regulations,
     the Municipality of Sta. Catalina passed Resolution No. 2008-057, enacting the
     “Integrated and Ecological Solid Waste Management Ordinance of Sta. Catalina.”
     Sections 41 and 42 of said ordinance outline the prohibited acts and corresponding
     penalties. However, upon verification thereof, we noted inconsistencies with the
     fines and penalties stipulated in RA 9003 and 11898. See Appendix 4 for details.

15.7 Furthermore, it is emphasized that RA 9003 requires that the prescribed fines be
     increased by at least 10 percent every three years to account for inflation and
     maintain the deterrent function of such fines. However, the above Resolution was
     issued on February 19, 2008, more than 10 years ago. The Municipality still uses
     the same Resolution for its Solid Waste Management.

15.8 These inconsistencies between the Municipality's solid waste management
     ordinance and the fines and penalties specified in RA 9003 and 11898 have
     significant implications. Primarily, the Municipality may be viewed as non-
     compliant with national laws, exposing itself to enforcement actions and legal
     consequences. This misalignment may also weaken the effectiveness of local law
     enforcement, as lower or inconsistent fines might fail to deter violators, resulting
     in continued improper waste disposal practices.

15.9 Additionally, public confusion may arise from the differing fines and penalties,
     leading to misunderstandings about the legal obligations of residents and
     businesses concerning solid waste management. Environmental degradation is
     another potential consequence, as ineffective penalties might not deter illegal
     dumping and other harmful waste practices, worsening pollution and ecological
     damage. Lastly, the Municipality could miss out on potential revenue from fines
     that could have been collected had the penalties been aligned with national laws.

15.10 We recommended and the Municipality’s Solid Waste Management Board
      agreed to:

   15.10.1 Conduct a comprehensive review of its existing solid waste
           management ordinance to ensure alignment with the provisions of RA
           9003 and 11898; and
   15.10.2 Enhance enforcement strategies, to ensure that penalties are
           consistently applied, discouraging violations and improving overall
           waste management practices.

15.11 We further recommended and the MENRO agreed to conduct public
      consultations and develop awareness campaigns to inform residents and



                                                                                       53