Meta PixelAnnual Audit Report 2024 — Municipality of Santa Catalina — Page 43

Page 43 of 67

Page 43
               consequent damage to the same extent as if the transaction had been wholly
               between private parties.”

   13.5 It must be noted that COA Circular No. 2012-003, dated October 29, 2012 entitled
        “Updated Guidelines for the Prevention and Disallowance of Irregular,
        Unnecessary, Excessive, Extravagant, and Unconscionable Expenses,” cited the
        abovementioned practice – entering into contracts without covering certificates of
        availability of funds issued by the Chief Accountant – as an illegal expenditure. In
        fact, GR Nos. 151373-74, dated November 17, 2005, in the case of Department of
        Health vs. CVCAA, et al., emphasized that any contract entered into in the absence
        of the aforementioned CAF shall be deemed void.

   13.6 Despite the Municipal Treasurer’s certification as to availability of funds on the
        face of the disbursement voucher, and the Municipal Budget Officer’s certification
        as to existence of available appropriations on the face of the obligation request
        form, it is still an essential condition for the Municipal Accountant to issue the
        CAF, as he/she is required by law, to ascertain the existence of appropriations
        therefor and the availability of funds to cover the proposed expenditure.

   13.7 We recommended and Management agreed to, henceforth, secure the
        Certificate of Availability of Funds (CAF) from the Municipal Accountant,
        prior to entering into any contract and before making any disbursement or
        obligations charged to any authorized appropriation, in accordance with
        Section 86 of PD No. 1445.


Granting of 25% monetary incentives to enforcers of the Anti-Littering Ordinance

14. The Municipal Government, through its Resolution on the Integrated and
    Ecological Solid Waste Management of Sta. Catalina, grants a monetary incentive
    of 25 percent of penalties paid or collected to enforcers for implementing the Anti-
    Littering Ordinance, which deviates from the Incentive Program provided in
    Republic Act (RA) Nos. 9003 and 11898, thus prohibiting the attainment of the
    Act's goal of promoting innovative environmental projects and processes and
    potentially leading to the improper disposition of public funds.

   14.1 Section 45 of RA 9003, as amended by RA 11898, stipulates the proper allocation
        of funds for enforcing solid waste management policies, including but not limited
        to the collection of fines for violations of the prohibited acts enumerated in the
        same Act. An incentive program is established to encourage local government
        units (LGUs), businesses, and private organizations—including obliged
        enterprises, Producer Responsibility Organizations (PROs), and non-
        governmental organizations (NGOs)—to develop or implement effective solid
        waste management systems. This includes the recovery and reduction of plastic
        product footprints or active participation in programs that promote these efforts.



                                                                                         47