Meta PixelAnnual Audit Report 2024 — Municipality of San Jose — Page 55

Page 55 of 103

Page 55
     2.7     Recording RPT and SET receivables is essential because they serve as references
             for decision-makers and financial statement users in determining the amounts still
             collectible and assessing the collection efficiency of the Municipal Treasurer.
             This information also enables the Local Chief Executive (LCE) to develop
             effective strategies to enhance RPT and collections. Additionally, it aids in
             reconciling records between the Treasurer, Assessor, and Accounting Offices.

     2.8     Consequently, the financial statements did not accurately reflect the correct
             balances of the RPT/SET Receivables.

     2.9     We recommended and the Municipal Treasurer agreed to provide the
             Municipal Accountant with a copy of the RPT records for CY 2024 and prior
             years to establish the beginning balance for CY 2025. The Municipal
             Treasurer also agreed to henceforth, furnish the Municipal Accountant at
             the beginning of each year with a certified list of taxpayers with amounts due
             and collectible for the current year as their basis for recording the RPT and
             SET Receivables in compliance with Sections 19(b) and 20 of the NGAS
             Manual for LGUs, Volume 1.

Biological Assets’ year-end balances were not reported at fair value less costs to sell -
₱3,311,219.14

 3. Biological Assets totaling ₱3,311,219.14 as of December 31, 2024, were not reported
     at fair value less costs to sell, which is inconsistent with Paragraph 17 of
     International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) 27, rendering the
     reported account in the financial statements unreliable.

     3.1     Paragraph 16 of IPSAS 27 requires that a biological asset be measured at its fair
             value less costs to sell upon initial recognition and at each reporting date.
             Furthermore, paragraph 30 of the same IPSAS states that a gain or loss arising on
             initial recognition of a biological asset at fair value less costs to sell as well as
             from a change in fair value less costs to sell of a biological asset shall be included
             in surplus or deficit for the period in which it arises.

     3.2     In relation to this, COA Circular No. 2016-004 dated September 30, 2016,
             provides guidelines for the preparation of financial statements in line with the
             adoption of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) by
             Local Government Units (LGUs). Section 4.5 of the circular specifies that the
             Municipal Agriculturist is responsible for providing the Municipal Accountant
             with an inventory of breeding stocks and other biological assets, along with the
             prevailing market price for each item as of the reporting date and information on
             the prevailing costs to sell these biological assets.

     3.3     However, our examination of the General Ledger and the Schedule of Biological
             Assets as of December 31, 2024, revealed the following Biological Assets
             purchased by the Municipality on various dates were still recorded at acquisition
             cost:


                                                                                                      40