Status of
Reference Observation Recommendations Implementation/
Result of Validation
4.) Owners are already
deceased and the
surviving heirs are
nowhere to be found.
CTO recommends total
cleansing of non-existing
properties.
Further coordination of
department/ offices shall
be conducted.
2018 AAR; The operation of 48. Management designate Not Implemented
AO No. 8; market, a responsible employee
Page No. slaughterhouse and to prepare a Five-Year Financial reports for the
56 transport terminal as BP and FSSE report for City’s LEEs were
LEEs is not consistent each LEE in accordance submitted to the Office
with the pertinent with the LEE Manual as of the Auditor, which are
provisions of the LEE basis for the LCE and still subject for review.
Manual as prescribed Sangguniang Further, management is
in Local Budget Panlungsod in coming awaiting approval from
Circular No. 111 dated up with a decision on the Sangguniang
June 10, 2016, thus, whether to continue the Panglungsod on the
might affect the LEE operations or other proposal to amend the
efficient and effective related actions to make Omnibus Market Code,
provision of basic them financially self- Slaughterhouse
services and facilities sufficient and Ordinance and Transport
to the constituents. eventually profitable to Terminal Ordinance.
ensure the efficient and
effective provision of
basic services and
facilities to the
constituents.
2018/ 2017 The City was not able 49. Management require the Not Implemented
AAR; to implement several CPDO and City
AO No. 9; projects under the 20% Engineer to fast track This audit
Page No. DF costing the implementation of recommendation is
59 ₱49,453,129.00 due to projects under the 20% restated/revised in CY
various reasons DF by addressing the 2024. (AO No. 5, Page
including insufficient causes of delay, like No. 65).
funds, road right-of- insufficient funds,
way problem, absence issues on road right-of-
of program of work, way, lack of POW, and
etc., as a result of requiring the barangays
inadequate planning, to implement their
hence, the 20% DF projects.
was not optimally
utilized contrary to
pertinent provisions of
RA No. 7160,
106
