Meta PixelAnnual Audit Report 2024 — City of Dumaguete — Page 35

Page 35 of 89

Page 35
             balance. While a 1.27 per cent and 5.05 per cent drop was observed in
             2021 and 2022, respectively—attributable to credit transactions related to
             housing projects—only a 0.58 per cent to 0.39 per cent downward trend
             was noted from 2023 to 2024. This highlights the continued slow pace of
             liquidation and weak monitoring, especially considering the long-standing
             age of these transfers. With fund transfers ranging from six (6) to 30 years
             old, the likelihood of settlement appears remote.

      4.4.4. Additionally, financial records revealed no impairment allowances were
             established for this account, which could signal an oversight in addressing
             the potential risk of non-recovery of these receivables.

 b. Inadequate monitoring, missing documents, and non-submission of liquidation
    reports

      4.4.5. Further analysis of the Due from NGOs/POs account showed the
             following components (Appendix 3):

                                                                   Percentage to
                 Particulars                    Amount               Due from
                                                                  NGOs/PO balance
       Housing Project                      ₱   33,139,755.43         71.27%
       Unidentified Entries                      8,571,088.34         18.43%
       NGOs/POs                                  2,711,747.41          5.83%
       Non-Interest Bearing Notes                2,075,190.60          4.47%
       Total                                ₱   46,497,781.78          100%

      4.4.6. As gleaned from the table above, a significant portion of the account,
             equivalent to 71.27 per cent or ₱33,139,755.43, is attributed to housing
             projects in various barangays. Moreover, we noted that 18.43 per cent
             (₱8,571,088.34) consists of unidentified entries recorded in the account.
             Notably, only 5.83 per cent (₱2,711,747.41) represents actual fund
             transfers to NGOs/POs for project implementation, while 4.47 per cent
             (₱2,075,190.60) pertains to non-interest-bearing notes.

      4.4.7. Evidently, inadequate monitoring has contributed to confusion and
             missing records regarding these fund transfers. For example, during our
             evaluation of the transactions, we noted that payments totaling
             ₱3,604,259.04 were made for the housing project. However, the CAO was
             unable to close the specific fund due to insufficient supporting
             documentation. As a result, the fund transfer cannot be marked as
             completed or removed from the books, resulting in the subsidiary ledger
             reflecting the following debit and credit transactions:

         Particulars            Debit               Credit               Balance
       Housing Project      ₱ 36,744,014.47      ₱ 3,604,259.04        ₱ 33,139,755.43
      (See Appendix 3)

4.5   During the interview with the CAO, it became apparent that documents related to
      the fund transfers and associated projects and programs were missing. This raises

                                                                                      63